WAYS OF THINKING

^Index:
• The Necessity of Rationality
• F. Seibold: Philosophical Teaching Poem
• Test your Knowledge about Cosmology and Theory of Measurement
• My Cosmology
• The Splendor of the Sky Disk from Nebra
• Test your Knowledge about Evolution
• The Reality Principle as Strategy of Knowledge
• Fundamentals of a Theory of Measurement
• HOMOMENSURA
• G. Galeczki, P. Marquardt: Between Instrumentalism and Realism
• General Foundations of Mechanics    · Long text
• The Meaning of Axioms
• Gravity and Inertia as Complementary Aspects *
• G. Galeczki: The fundamental Difference between Gravity and Electricity *
• An Upside-Down World. Two Ways of Thinking and four Wrongnesses
• Einstein's Dilemma
• Does the Michelson Experiment call for a Relativistic Explanation?
• G. Galeczki: Special Relativity's Heel of Achilles: The Units of Measurement
• GOD'S BIG BANG? Comments on the Open Questions of Cosmology *
• A Plea for Holistic Effects *
• Gadamer and the Problem of Hermeneutics
• The trap of metaphors - new!
• The Generation of Spirituality
• What is Life? The End of the Hen-Egg Problem?
• Autism as a Field of Research. Forms of the Autism
• F. Seibold: A New World Outlook
• G. Galeczki: The II-nd List of Publications
  * = complementary to "My Cosmology"

Warning-hint: All texts are reflecting the opinion of the respective author and do not follow absolutely ruling doctrines. Don't confront your teachers or bosses with especially unorthodox theses! You could get problems, for whose consequences we cannot be made liable for!

---

The Necessity of Rationality

Popper demanded that scientist should be critical rationalists. But it is not enough to conjure up objective recognition, it also has to be stated how it is defined and by what means it is gained. Only the application of carefully clarified rational principles is giving the scientist the competence that is expected from him. Therefore the texts about physics and cosmology are mainly about these principles. Furthermore they are dealing with the clarification of terms and of the roll of the observer, who has always to be considered. For not only unexamined intuitive assumptions and unclear terms do create problems, but also an unadjusted thinking towards the object of scientific research. The cognitive problem of the physicists is to consider inanimated objects in the according categories. Men however has mainly learned during his history to think in categories of the living, with himself as pattern. Therefore he objects sun, moon and stars as 'resting' or 'moving' although they've got no according organs to give those expression a sense which could be explaining anything. It would be right to talk about a 'change of place' here, although the 'place' often only exists in the perspective of the observer which has to be considered, too. That's the only way to avoid pretended problems.
     To understand the physical object adequately, which means to cope with it, the physicist has finally to become aware of his instincts which are orientated towards the living and has to overcome them. He instinctively rejects, since he fears to loose his usual fitness in dealing with the world. Therefore he, if at all, only asks during critical situations half-heartedly for the foundations of his research. However those foundations are what my considerations here are about, since only those do convey a critical point of view.
_{translated by Peter Hille M.A.}